IT : Where in course of examination for appointment of Members of Tribunal, petitioner was placed in waiting list but his appointment was not confirmed on account of contention made by Union of India that it would make suitable amendment in Rules for said purpose, in view of fact that fresh selection process was started without making any such amendment in Rules, instant petition was to be allowed with a direction to consider appointment of petitioner on basis of his position in waiting list
■■■
[2014] 50 taxmann.com 50 (SC)
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Inturi Rama Rao
v.
Union of India
RANJAN GOGOI AND R.K. AGRAWAL, JJ.
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 202 OF 2013
SEPTEMBER 23, 2014
Nidhesh Gupta, Sr. Adv. Atul Kumar, Adv. Amit Kumar Adv. and Avijit Mani Tripathi Adv. for the Petitioner. Tushar Mehta, ASG Shiv Mangal Sharma, Adv. Ms. Usha Reddy, Adv. Vivek Ranjan Mohanty, Adv. D.S. Mahra Adv. and B.V. Balaram Das Adv. for the Respondent.
■■■
[2014] 50 taxmann.com 50 (SC)
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Inturi Rama Rao
v.
Union of India
RANJAN GOGOI AND R.K. AGRAWAL, JJ.
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 202 OF 2013
SEPTEMBER 23, 2014
Nidhesh Gupta, Sr. Adv. Atul Kumar, Adv. Amit Kumar Adv. and Avijit Mani Tripathi Adv. for the Petitioner. Tushar Mehta, ASG Shiv Mangal Sharma, Adv. Ms. Usha Reddy, Adv. Vivek Ranjan Mohanty, Adv. D.S. Mahra Adv. and B.V. Balaram Das Adv. for the Respondent.
No comments:
Post a Comment