CUSTOMS EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
West Block No.2, R.K.Puram, New Delhi
COURT-I
Date of hearing/decision: 11.07.2014
For Approval and Signature:
Hon ble Mr. Justice G. Raghuram, President
Hon ble Mr. R. K. Singh, Technical Member
1
Whether Press Reporter may be allowed to see the Order for publication as per Rule 26 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982?
2
Whether it should be released under Rule 26 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 for publication in any authoritative report or not?
3
Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the Order?
4
Whether Order is to be circulated to the Departmental authorities?
Service Tax Appeal No. 26 of 2012
(Arising out of the Order-in-Appeal No. 151-153/ST/ALLD/2011 dated 31.10.2011 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax, Allahabad).
M/s Aprup Trading & Services Appellant
Vs.
CCE, ST, Allahabad Revenue
Appearance: None for the appellant
Shri Govind Dixit, DR for the Revenue
Coram: Hon ble Mr. Justice G.Raghuram, President
Hon ble Mr. R. K. Singh, Technical Member
Final Order No. 52767/2014
Per Justice G. Raghuram:
When this appeal of the year 2012 is called for hearing today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Notice for hearing of this appeal scheduled on 22.05.2014 was received by the appellant. On said date Shri O. P. Agarwal, Ld. CA represented on behalf of the ld. Counsel for the appellant for an adjournment.
2. Hence the appeal was adjourned to this day in the presence of the representative of the appellant s Counsel. When the matter is called for hearing today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default.
(Justice G. Raghuram)
President
(R. K. Singh)
Technical Member
Pant
West Block No.2, R.K.Puram, New Delhi
COURT-I
Date of hearing/decision: 11.07.2014
For Approval and Signature:
Hon ble Mr. Justice G. Raghuram, President
Hon ble Mr. R. K. Singh, Technical Member
1
Whether Press Reporter may be allowed to see the Order for publication as per Rule 26 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982?
2
Whether it should be released under Rule 26 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 for publication in any authoritative report or not?
3
Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the Order?
4
Whether Order is to be circulated to the Departmental authorities?
Service Tax Appeal No. 26 of 2012
(Arising out of the Order-in-Appeal No. 151-153/ST/ALLD/2011 dated 31.10.2011 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax, Allahabad).
M/s Aprup Trading & Services Appellant
Vs.
CCE, ST, Allahabad Revenue
Appearance: None for the appellant
Shri Govind Dixit, DR for the Revenue
Coram: Hon ble Mr. Justice G.Raghuram, President
Hon ble Mr. R. K. Singh, Technical Member
Final Order No. 52767/2014
Per Justice G. Raghuram:
When this appeal of the year 2012 is called for hearing today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Notice for hearing of this appeal scheduled on 22.05.2014 was received by the appellant. On said date Shri O. P. Agarwal, Ld. CA represented on behalf of the ld. Counsel for the appellant for an adjournment.
2. Hence the appeal was adjourned to this day in the presence of the representative of the appellant s Counsel. When the matter is called for hearing today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default.
(Justice G. Raghuram)
President
(R. K. Singh)
Technical Member
Pant
No comments:
Post a Comment