CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
WEST BLOCK NO.II, R.K. PURAM, NEW DELHI-110066.
DIVISION BENCH
Court No.2
Appeal No.C/123/2010-Cus
(Arising out of OIA No.IND-i/327/09/APPL/09 dt.29.12.09 passed by CCE (Appeals), Indore)
Aadi Chem Trade Pvt. Ltd. Appellant
Vs.
CC, Indore Respondent
Present for the Appellant: Shri V.P.Batra, DR
Present for the Respondent: None
Date of Hearing/Decision: 15.07.2014
Coram: Hon ble Mr. D.N. Panda, Member (Judicial)
Hon ble Mr.Manmohan Singh, Member (Technical)
FINAL ORDER NO.52808/2014
PER: D.N. PANDA
None present for the appellant nor is there any adjournment application. Appeal is four years old.
2. Ld.DR says that when the buyer of the goods is not known to the appellant, there is no question of refund to the appellant. Inviting our attention to the para 6 of the appellate order, he supports the case of the Revenue on the ground that appellant at no stage submitted any evidences to prove that incidence of duty have not been passed on to its buyers.
2. Heard the Revenue.
3. Submission of ld.DR is correct when para 6 of the appellate order is read. From the ground of appeal, it is apparent that the appellant has not rebutted the finding of Commissioner nor produced any cogent evidence to prove its case. Accordingly appeal is dismissed.
(Dictated & pronounced in the open court)
(MANMOHAN SINGH) (D.N. PANDA)
TECHNICAL MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
mk
1
C/123/2010-Cus
WEST BLOCK NO.II, R.K. PURAM, NEW DELHI-110066.
DIVISION BENCH
Court No.2
Appeal No.C/123/2010-Cus
(Arising out of OIA No.IND-i/327/09/APPL/09 dt.29.12.09 passed by CCE (Appeals), Indore)
Aadi Chem Trade Pvt. Ltd. Appellant
Vs.
CC, Indore Respondent
Present for the Appellant: Shri V.P.Batra, DR
Present for the Respondent: None
Date of Hearing/Decision: 15.07.2014
Coram: Hon ble Mr. D.N. Panda, Member (Judicial)
Hon ble Mr.Manmohan Singh, Member (Technical)
FINAL ORDER NO.52808/2014
PER: D.N. PANDA
None present for the appellant nor is there any adjournment application. Appeal is four years old.
2. Ld.DR says that when the buyer of the goods is not known to the appellant, there is no question of refund to the appellant. Inviting our attention to the para 6 of the appellate order, he supports the case of the Revenue on the ground that appellant at no stage submitted any evidences to prove that incidence of duty have not been passed on to its buyers.
2. Heard the Revenue.
3. Submission of ld.DR is correct when para 6 of the appellate order is read. From the ground of appeal, it is apparent that the appellant has not rebutted the finding of Commissioner nor produced any cogent evidence to prove its case. Accordingly appeal is dismissed.
(Dictated & pronounced in the open court)
(MANMOHAN SINGH) (D.N. PANDA)
TECHNICAL MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
mk
1
C/123/2010-Cus
No comments:
Post a Comment